Home Search About Aceh Kalimantan IDPs Research methodologies Social science resources Policy alternatives Conflict futures Study centers online Indonesian research centers Print, media resources Bibliographies Publications | | Land Conversion and Threats to Biodiversity and Orangutans in Kalimantan also: AFP: Palm oil workers killing endangered orangutans: activists
also: Op-Ed: It's cars versus humans [By Henry Saragih]
The Jakarta Post Thursday, July 26, 2007
Land conversion, forest fires threaten Kalimantan's orangutans
Alvin Darlanika Soedarjo , The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
The government has been urged to stop deforestation in order to protect the rapidly decreasing orangutan population on the island of Kalimantan.
"We demand the government, in this case the Forestry Ministry, re-evaluate and stop forest deforestation and conversion to oil palm plantations," chairman of the Centre for Orangutan Protection (COP) Hardi Baktiantoro said Wednesday.
"They are a threat to the existence of orangutans."
Hardi said at a press conference on orangutan protection that the species was mostly seen by plantation companies as a pest because it ate palm oil buds.
"Our organization is not anti the palm oil industry, which produces green energy or biofuel. However, many of their workers will cruelly do anything to the primates to protect their crops," he said.
"This is a violation of the 1990 Conservation Law. Violators may face up to five years in prison or a fine of Rp 100 million."
Also present at the press conference were chairman of the Orang Utan Republik Education Initiative of Indonesia, Barita O. Manullang, and Harvard University anthropologist Cheryl D. Knott, who is also chairman of the Palung Foundation in West Kalimantan.
The COP estimates that at least 1,500 orangutans were killed in Central Kalimantan alone last year as a direct result of forest conversion to oil palm plantation.
"Kalimantan still has about 34,000 orangutans left. Plantation companies should try to use critical or abandoned land instead," Hardi said.
However, Forestry Ministry spokesman Masyhud said the figure was "bombastic, because there are not many oil palm plantations in Central Kalimantan," he told The Jakarta Post over the phone.
"Converted forests are those already set for production purposes and not for conservation purposes."
Kalimantan orangutans are also struggling to survive in their natural habitat because of fires set to clear land.
Barita said that people should not rely too much orangutan mortality rate figures as they were only extrapolations of other data.
"Even the Forestry Ministry asks us NGOs for orangutan mortality statistics," said Barita.
Knott said that empowering local communities to cultivate other type of plants for consumption could help in fostering biodiversity.
Separately, Central Kalimantan governor Teras Narang said that despite the administration's efforts to save the orangutan and its habitat, a better set of protection laws was still needed.
"The laws are yet to lean on primates or biodiversity protection," Teras said over the phone, adding that he opted for multicultural rather than monoculture plantations due to their greater ability to conserve biodiversity.
"Moreover, what we have tried to conserve here would be pointless if the central government, in this case the Forestry Ministry, keeps issuing massive concession permits," he said.
------------------------------- Palm oil workers killing endangered orangutans: activists
JAKARTA, July 25 (AFP) -- Workers on Indonesian palm oil plantations are deliberately killing endangered orangutans on the island of Borneo to stop them eating their seedlings, activists said on Wednesday.
Hardi Baktiantoro, director of the Centre for Orangutan Protection (COP), said at least 1,500 orangutans perished in 2006, most as a result of deliberate attacks but also due to their habitat disappearing to make way for palm oil plantations.
"Orangutans have become the victims of torture by plantation workers as they wander and eat palm oil seedlings for survival," Baktiantoro told reporters.
As plantation workers had to pay concession companies for the loss of the seedlings, they had no choice but to pursue the primates, he said.
Video footage screened at a press briefing showed dead orangutans with severe head wounds allegedly inflicted by workers as well as severely injured animals that were treated by COP and other local rescue teams.
Baktiantoro said that "even though this kind of cruelty violates Indonesia's law on biodiversity conservation, no one until now has been arrested for this crime."
The COP urged the Indonesian government to immediately cancel concessions to palm oil companies in a bid to protect the orangutans.
"Central Kalimantan is the final frontier of the orangutan population in Indonesia. If the forest clearing continues, we will soon lose our national treasure," he warned.
Scientists estimate that 34,000 orangutans remain in Central Kalimantan province on Borneo.
Vice President Jusuf Kalla has said that Indonesia plans to be the largest palm oil producer by 2008 amid strong demand from the global food, bio-fuel and chemicals industries.
Indonesia is currently the second largest producer after Malaysia although it has a much larger area for plantations. The two countries account for 85 percent of world production.
A spokesman for the Indonesian Palm Oil Producers Association was not immediately available for comment.
Environmentalists say an estimated 16.8 million hectares (41.5 million acres) of forest have been cleared for palm oil plantations in Indonesia, but only 6.3 million hectares have actually been planted with the crop.
They allege permits to open new plantations are more often used as a pretext to clear land and sell the valuable logs.
-------------------------------
The Jakarta Post Thursday, July 26, 2007
It's cars versus humans
Henry Saragih , Jakarta
Farmers all over the world are very worried about the escalating issue of agrofuel. At the Nyilini World Forum for Food Sovereignty in February, La Via Campesina, along with hundreds of other organizations, stressed that the prefix 'bio' in biofuel did not guarantee that this phyto-fuel was environmentally sound. Furthermore, the term is very misleading and politically incorrect.
In the global context, we are witnessing a major alliance among transnational corporations: oil companies, which want to reduce their dependence on oil; carmakers, which want to continue profiting from the current individual transportation model; and agribusiness companies, which want to continue monopolizing the world agricultural market. And not to mention the role of the developed countries, such as the United States and the European Union (EU), in their desire to maintain their hegemony over the global economy. Their effort to raise this issue is being countered by the new emerging forces in Latin America, which consist mainly of the world's leading oil-producing countries.
What will happen then if it becomes more profitable to produce agrofuel than rice, corn, cassava, cotton or soybeans? Farmers will, of course, replace food crops, which generally have a lower profit margin -- because consumers have low incomes -- with agrofuel crops. A friend of mine, Joao Pedro Stedile of the Landless Workers' Movement of Brazil (MST), dubs it a rule of capitalism.
In the Indonesian context, this topic is very much related to palm oil. The skyrocketing price of crude palm oil (CPO) and cooking oil is closely linked to the hype over CPO-based agrofuel. As the world's second largest producer after Malaysia, many of the major palm oil producers quickly sniffed the huge profits they could make from the trend. This can be seen from the plans by IndoAgri and London Sumatra to expand their plantations to 250,000 hectares by 2015.
Backed by growing concern over climate change and global warming, the EU parliament has set itself a target of substituting agrofuel for up to 5.75 percent of total vehicle fuel by 2010, and doubling this to 10 percent by 2020. The U.S., a country that has been firmly refusing to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, has been playing the role of an environmental defender by utilizing up to 35 billion gallons per year of agrofuel as part of its effort to shrink its carbon emissions.
It is clear that these two global forces do not have enough farmland to meet their targets (Holt-Gimenez, 2007), and will resort to large-scale agrofuel importation. Major agribusiness corporations from tropical countries, where many of these energy-producing crops can grow, are trying to meet the EU and U.S. demand.
The rising price of cooking oil is making people here suffer as it is one of the nine basic commodities. Despite public disquiet, the corporations insist on exporting CPO to reap bigger profits. The government is almost helpless in responding to this situation since its ad hoc instruments, such as export tax and the domestic market obligation mechanisms, are unable to solve the problem.
At least 1.5 million tons of Indonesian CPO is exported to Europe, and nearly all is turned into agrofuel. On the other hand, hundreds of people have to queue for subsidized cooking oil. This shows that agrofuel gives rise to competition between cars and human beings. According to Monbiot (2007), human beings -- and the environment -- will lose this unfair battle. Those who can afford to drive are certainly richer that those who are in danger of starvation, and money is the major weapon in this capitalistic world.
Moreover, from the environmental point of view, agrofuel does not significantly contribute to curbing pollution, and may in fact exacerbate global warming. According to Monbiot, each ton of palm oil that is turned into agrofuel releases 33 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, 10 times more than the emissions released by fossil fuels.
This race could destroy our agrarian and food system. Farmers and peasants all over the globe have been crying our for years for an end to unjust agrarian structures. In the case of peasants in Indonesia, palm-plantation expansion has long resulted in the marginalization of local farmers, dating back in fact to colonial days. In 2006 alone, the expansion of oil-palm plantations produced 350 agrarian conflicts.
With this continuing capitalistic mode of production, only a few hands (the corporations) will end up owning more than 67 percent of the land intended for food production.
Farmers need a fundamental solution, which we call agrarian reform, which is economically and socially capable of addressing long-standing agrarian injustices. Legally, agrarian reform in Indonesia is based on Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and the 1960 Agrarian Law.
The battle against agrofuel, of course, not only involves farmers and peasants. We need people, workers, youth, and environmentalists to actively get involved as agrofuel has already caused a catastrophe for our environment. Finally, we need consumers to voice our concerns. Otherwise, for the sake of capital and the agrofuel trend, we will lose our food and our livelihoods.
The writer is the secretary-general of the Indonesian Farmers' Union Federation (FSPI), and general coordinator of La Via Campesina, the international peasant movement.
------------------------------------------
|